Ecological Impact Assessment of Water Level Increase at Mullapperiyar Dam, Kerala
Independent studies indicate that there are chances of dam breaking in
case the water level of the dam is raised beyond 136 ft. The ecological
impact of such an eventuality will be catastrophic. Easiest way to
avoid that will be to restrict the water level in the reservoir within
the present limit.
The Committee is concerned to observe that any increase in water
level will submerge a greater part of the critical grasslands of the
Periyar ecosystem, and this could severely impair the food chain of the
endangered tiger whose prey base is the deers depending on the
grassland. Such likelihood in a Reserve dedicated to tiger and
protected by the Wildlife Protection Act 1972, including its latest
amendment should be completely avoided. Additionally, loss of
grasslands will also drastically affect the viewing of the animals.
While the animals may recreate a foreshore for their convenience in due
course, it is likely to take several years. In the meantime, there will
be a likelihood of considerable fall in tourist interest, which in turn
may significantly reduce the earning of the local people as also the
revenue flowing towards protected area management and nature education.
It will be imperative to carry out a detailed EIA (Environmental Impact
Assessment), as a statutory requirement to fully understand the
ecological impact of raising the water level. The study will have to be
on the basis of a. scientific design of research. Substantial
information on the ecological impact of raising the water level of the
dam on the surrounding ecosystem, including human habitation, is
available from the Kerela Forest Research Institute (KFRI).
Signs of distress and fear are visible amongst the tribes people living
round the settlement areas comprising six villages. This state of
distress in the minds of the settlers, particularly the children,
should be separately studied.
Until the completion of the EIA studies, including a comprehensive
study of the ecological impact of raising the water level of the
reservoir along with a social cost benefit study of the additional
expenses that will have to be incurred by way of strengthening of dam
and laying of new distributary system for the additional water, all the
engineering efforts to raise the water level should be put on hold.
This is also because .any large scale prolonged movement of men,
material and machinery through a patch of land, which is endowed with a
rich biodiversity, is not desirable within a protected area.
According to Section 9 of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 'No
person shall destroy, exploit or remove any wild life including forest
produce from a sanctuary or destroy or damage or divert the habitat of
any wild animal by any act whatsoever or divert, stop or enhance the
flow of water into or outside the sanctuary, except under and in
accordance with a permit granted by the Chief Wild Life Warden, and no such permit shall be granted unless the State
Government being satisfied in consultation with the Board that such
removal of wild life from the sanctuary or the change in the flow of
water into or outside the sanctuary is necessary for the improvement
and , better management of wild life therein, authorizes the issue of
The expert team strongly recommends adherence to the provision of this Act in its entirety.
A decision regarding the strengthening of the dam or any new
construction that may be suggested will require the involvement of the
Forest Department so that measures could be taken to minimise the
damage inflicted on the protected eco-system: This is obligatory
because the dam lies within a wildlife sanctuary which is now a part of
a tiger reserve and also an elephant reserve.
Since 1979, at least six conglomerations of human settlements,
predominantly tribal, have come up. Public institutions and commercial
establishments have also grown. Raising of water level would mean
displacement of a large number of families along with their economic
activities. Therefore, the question of allowing additional water to
Tamil Nadu will also have to be weighed against the lives and
livelihood of these tribal people, since they will be forced to go back
into the forest and start exploiting the ecosystem. This will also
destroy the benefits accruing from the eco-development projects of the
Forest Department over the years.
At present the matters relating to raising of water level are only
handled by the Water Resources Department. It will be advisable to set
up a coordinating committee headed by the Chief Minister of the State
with all the stake-holder departments within its fold. This will allow
convergence and best use of .all the related views and expertise to
ensure the ecological security of the natural resource system in
question as well as the protection of life and livelihood of the people
which is likely to be threatened in case of any deviation from the
present state of protected area management.
Dr Dhrubajyoti Ghosh
Dr H.SA Yahya
Shri S. K. Patnaik